Pondering Happy Independence · 5 July 2007
Since starting this blog, I tend to view holidays as opportunities to try out new and exciting food on unsuspecting crowds. So, I was really looking forward to doing something fun for the 4th of July. Imagine my chagrin when I learned I had been assigned to bring . . . the watermelon.
In retrospect, it was a good assignment. I barely managed to get to the store to purchase said watermelon, and managed to forget all sorts of other important things (like towels, sun block, and shoes) in the packing process.
While I haven’t had much time to do any recreational reading or cooking, I have driven 700 miles in the past week (ugh), so I’ve had plenty of time to think. On the various car trips leading up to the celebration, NPR spent a bit of time covering the 4th of July holiday. As our national holiday, it deserved a bit of attention.
One of the questions I usually ask myself about holidays is what we’re really celebrating. You can read the archives and see that my feelings about the observance of things is that many holidays have evolved into days where we appreciate our current life, rather than the original intent of the holidays. The 4th of July is no exception. After 231 years, we’re not so much celebrating independence from the King of England, as we’re celebrating the continuation of the American way of life. This, of course, begs the question, “Just what is the American way of life these days?”
Obviously, the answer will be different depending on the person you’re asking. But, two themes that I found prevalent in listening to the celebratory speeches and coverage of the holiday were “freedom” and “independence.” It struck me this year that people are bandying those terms around as unarguable truths and virtues of the country. They have become magic words, words that cannot be questioned, lest you be seen as un-American.
Yet the Declaration of Independence never mentioned freedom (it included liberty which was more narrowly defined), and mentioned independence only in the context of independence from an inattentive political ruling body. On the other hand, other documents of the time mentioned American virtues such as a well informed and active voting populace. With voter turnout currently averaging 54% and continuing to drop, that expectation is no longer part of our national identity. On the upside, it’s no longer culturally acceptable to own slaves. American ideals have changed over the years and the modern rhetoric of freedom of personal choice and independence has gradually evolved with these ideals.
What has drawn my attention lately is the constant clamoring for freedom and the equally stringent political rhetoric against freedom. Freedom means having choices. Inherent in having choices is the infamous ability not to make a choice, and the freedom to make bad choices. Freedom also means taking the responsibility to deal with those choices. Without responsibility, freedom becomes meaningless, and results in stagnation and apathy.
When I was originally envisioning this blog article, I was intending to talk about economic freedom, to show that a type of freedom is in making choices that make us independent from those we don’t wish to support, and to illustrate my own slight steps towards independence by continuing to grow my herbs (Hey, at $1.69 a pop, not having to buy herbs is quite a feat of economic freedom for me). I was intending to tie this into the increased clamoring for government provided services, such as national health care. But, as I was driving to work this morning, I was reminded of a recent story that I felt needed to be discussed in the light of freedom and independence, but not in the traditional manner.
On April 18, 2007 the Supreme Court upheld a state’s right to ban “partial birth abortion”. As part of the court’s opinion, narrative accounts of women who regretted having an abortion were cited. I know that the abortion debate is one which people have very strong opinions about. I’m not going to discuss the merits of being pro-life or pro-choice here. What I do want to discuss is the fact that the Supreme Court has just used the fact that women might make a choice they’ll regret, and inferred that women should be “protected” from that choice as part of a legal argument.
Welcome to the real world everyone. Freedom requires choice. Choices have two sides. We’re human and we don’t always make the right choices. We regret; we grieve; we have bad days. We go on with life, hopefully learning something in the experience.
I know that there are some things I regret. Do I for a second wish that the state had “protected” me from making the “wrong” choice by legislating my ability to do so away from me? No way.
No matter what your viewpoint on the abortion issue, if this part of the rationale for the decision doesn’t scare you silly, you should think about the wider repercussions. How long will it be until other choices are taken away from us? How long before the definition of freedom, that unalienable right of today’s American society goes the way of the definition of the white male landowner as the only person able to vote? How long until the generation being raised doesn’t even realize that what we consider freedom has been taken from them?
I ate my watermelon yesterday afternoon and I enjoyed it. I hope that twenty years from now, I’ll enjoy the sweet taste of freedom on a 4th of July just as much as I did this year.
On a lighter note, the photographs are of my budding herbs (the original subject matter of this post).
4th of July,
Choice,
Freedom,
Politics
-
Share this article
Atlas Shrugged Movie · 17 February 2007
I recently received an e-mail tip off from an unexpected source. A friend I haven’t talked to in years popped me a one line message titled “Atlas Shrugged Movie” that was simply this link.
Atlas Shrugged may have been the most influential book of my teen-age years and is on the short list for my favorite book of all time. I read it at a time of unrivaled emotional upheaval, during a forced vacation that to this day remains my worst holiday experience ever. During this period of what I perceived as no less than betrayal, I drew some less than kind parallels between the antagonists in the book and the people in my life.
Suffice to say, my perception of Atlas Shrugged is tinged with the comfort it brought me as an escape to that weekend, with the hope that it inspired in me, and with the angry bravado that drove the “rebellion” of my late high school experience. I generally re-read the book every few years and it never fails to motivate me to strive towards exaction and excellence.
Since the book is such a lodestone of emotion for me, I greeted the news that it would be adapted to film with slight trepidation. Many books make successful transitions into the world of visual media, but few retain the precise quality of the books. Upon reading that Atlas Shrugged was to be adapted, my initial reaction was mixed due to concern that the movie couldn’t do justice to the book.
Atlas Shrugged is essentially the product of a philosophy to which the story is secondary. It’s a behemoth of a book at over 1,000 pages. As such, a lot of the subtlety is bound to be cut in the movie adaptation, even assuming the current plans to release the story as a trilogy go forward.
To all outward appearances, the producers of the Atlas Shrugged movie appear committed to retaining as much of the original method and message of the book as possible, but I believe the nature of the message is best presented in the repetition of Rand’s philosophy as she slowly builds a world in which the protagonists (the objectivists) are seemingly defeated by those who do not follow her philosophy. Only by incrementally unfolding the consequences of following an anti-objectivist path does the reader gain full insight into the climatic and catastrophic end product of that path.
Much like the repetition in Bolero by Ravel is a necessary part of the song, the repetition of key elements in Atlas Shrugged is a necessary part in the understanding of Rand’s message. In my experience, this technique is better suited to the written word than to film and my concern is that even the most dedicated producers may succumb to Hollywood's pressure to make a movie that will appeal to an increasingly impatient public. However, even an abbreviated version of Atlas Shrugged, if embraced by a mainstream audience, may have positive benefits.
The recent disturbing news from Venezuela regarding the nationalization of “key industries” by the Venezuelan government (and this week’s threats by the same government to nationalize grocery stores that are electing not sell staples rather lose money by selling them at the government fixed prices) isn’t making many waves in the U.S. public debate. It is hopeful that a narrative illustration, like Atlas Shrugged, of the eventual outcome of such socialist actions may raise the public consciousness of the issue, and inspire further examination of socialist policies being promoted in our own government.
If the movie raises these questions to its audience and inspires that audience to participate in meaningful and educated discourse about them, I will consider it a success.
Searchable keywords/ Technorati tags: Fiction Literature Modern Classics Objectivism Politics Ayn Rand
-
Share this article
